▲ 754 ▼ Bose open-sources its SoundTouch home theater smart speakers ahead of end-of-life (arstechnica.com) submitted 10 months ago by yesman@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 60 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children) open source is always a spectrum It most definitely is not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Hawke@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (2 children) It is a spectrum (MIT vs GPL vs APL for example) but this is outside that spectrum. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago (1 child) That is not a spectrum of open source. They are all open source, as in you can access the source code without restriction. These licenses just limit what you can do with the source code. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Hawke@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago Well, yeah. That’s what the spectrum is. Low end: “you can see the source but can’t do anything with it” (questionable whether this counts as open source at all) High end “do what you want, it’s literally yours” (public domain). One can debate where the low boundary of “open source” is, or what makes one license more or less free than another, but the spectrum is the range of limitations. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (2 children) It is a spectrum (MIT vs GPL vs APL for example) but this is outside that spectrum. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago (1 child) That is not a spectrum of open source. They are all open source, as in you can access the source code without restriction. These licenses just limit what you can do with the source code. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Hawke@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago Well, yeah. That’s what the spectrum is. Low end: “you can see the source but can’t do anything with it” (questionable whether this counts as open source at all) High end “do what you want, it’s literally yours” (public domain). One can debate where the low boundary of “open source” is, or what makes one license more or less free than another, but the spectrum is the range of limitations. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago (1 child) That is not a spectrum of open source. They are all open source, as in you can access the source code without restriction. These licenses just limit what you can do with the source code. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Hawke@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago Well, yeah. That’s what the spectrum is. Low end: “you can see the source but can’t do anything with it” (questionable whether this counts as open source at all) High end “do what you want, it’s literally yours” (public domain). One can debate where the low boundary of “open source” is, or what makes one license more or less free than another, but the spectrum is the range of limitations. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago Well, yeah. That’s what the spectrum is. Low end: “you can see the source but can’t do anything with it” (questionable whether this counts as open source at all) High end “do what you want, it’s literally yours” (public domain). One can debate where the low boundary of “open source” is, or what makes one license more or less free than another, but the spectrum is the range of limitations. permalink fedilink source parent