▲ 579 ▼ Grok AI still being used to digitally undress women and children despite suspension pledge (www.theguardian.com) submitted 10 months ago by BoycottTwitter@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world 86 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Deceptichum 61 points 10 months ago (7 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago (6 children) If they are being stored on his servers then he absolutely should be, and whoever else is in charge of that company. If that was found on any regular persons pc it would be over, so why not here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (4 children) In America: Section 230 of the Communications Act provides immunity for online platforms and users, stating they generally aren't liable for content posted by others, allowing them to host third-party information without being treated as the "publisher or speaker". I'm guessing Europe has a similar provision. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago (1 child) This would be a valid argument if X itself weren't the ones generating the images. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago Oh! I hadn't thought that through. Guess we don't have laws to cover hold AI responsible and the company can simply dodge responsibility. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago But it’s their own servers that generates de image. And how it was trained to be able to generate it in the first place? permalink fedilink source parent [–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago Thanks! That makes sense. Although it's not really others if you ask me, its themselves. I'm sure they would argue otherwise. No accountability and it's only getting worse. permalink fedilink source parent [–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago The story says: After days of concern over use of the chatbot to alter photographs to create sexualised pictures of real women and children stripped to their underwear without their consent Pictures of women or children in underwear are generally not illegal in the United States. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago (6 children) If they are being stored on his servers then he absolutely should be, and whoever else is in charge of that company. If that was found on any regular persons pc it would be over, so why not here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (4 children) In America: Section 230 of the Communications Act provides immunity for online platforms and users, stating they generally aren't liable for content posted by others, allowing them to host third-party information without being treated as the "publisher or speaker". I'm guessing Europe has a similar provision. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago (1 child) This would be a valid argument if X itself weren't the ones generating the images. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago Oh! I hadn't thought that through. Guess we don't have laws to cover hold AI responsible and the company can simply dodge responsibility. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago But it’s their own servers that generates de image. And how it was trained to be able to generate it in the first place? permalink fedilink source parent [–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago Thanks! That makes sense. Although it's not really others if you ask me, its themselves. I'm sure they would argue otherwise. No accountability and it's only getting worse. permalink fedilink source parent [–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago The story says: After days of concern over use of the chatbot to alter photographs to create sexualised pictures of real women and children stripped to their underwear without their consent Pictures of women or children in underwear are generally not illegal in the United States. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (4 children) In America: Section 230 of the Communications Act provides immunity for online platforms and users, stating they generally aren't liable for content posted by others, allowing them to host third-party information without being treated as the "publisher or speaker". I'm guessing Europe has a similar provision. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago (1 child) This would be a valid argument if X itself weren't the ones generating the images. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago Oh! I hadn't thought that through. Guess we don't have laws to cover hold AI responsible and the company can simply dodge responsibility. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago But it’s their own servers that generates de image. And how it was trained to be able to generate it in the first place? permalink fedilink source parent [–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago Thanks! That makes sense. Although it's not really others if you ask me, its themselves. I'm sure they would argue otherwise. No accountability and it's only getting worse. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago (1 child) This would be a valid argument if X itself weren't the ones generating the images. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago Oh! I hadn't thought that through. Guess we don't have laws to cover hold AI responsible and the company can simply dodge responsibility. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago Oh! I hadn't thought that through. Guess we don't have laws to cover hold AI responsible and the company can simply dodge responsibility. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago But it’s their own servers that generates de image. And how it was trained to be able to generate it in the first place? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago Thanks! That makes sense. Although it's not really others if you ask me, its themselves. I'm sure they would argue otherwise. No accountability and it's only getting worse. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago The story says: After days of concern over use of the chatbot to alter photographs to create sexualised pictures of real women and children stripped to their underwear without their consent Pictures of women or children in underwear are generally not illegal in the United States. permalink fedilink source parent