you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I hear you, but I think state-run liquor stores are just a holdover from Prohibition mentality, not to make sure booze is affordable for the poor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    The point is that the world doesn’t end when the government sells stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Oh I agree, and I love Mamdani's ideas. I just think state-run liquor stores aren't a great parallel because they come with issues food stores don't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm from the US so I don't understand what issues might be there if govt operates food stores?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    It's the other way around - government run liquor stores started after Prohibition to make sure liquor laws keeping booze away from minors were enforced properly. Food stores don't have that issue. And we're talking about NYC.

  • source
  • parent