you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

We know some of the effects, like endocrine and cellular disruption, which should be damning enough but the media likes to make it sound like microplastics may not be bad, people are being alarmist, etc. Because the media is owned by people who would be negatively affected by a plastic ban. Much like how we know tire and brake dust is a cause of autism, but no one is willing to put that in a headline.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    The link between tire and brake dust to ASD isn't a concrete causation yet. The papers do show a correlation, yes, but that isn't the same as definitive proof of causation.

    For example, areas with higher tire/brake dust will have higher vehicle traffic, so it might be some other pollutant vehicles produce.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 1 point 10 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago*

    Sure. But they were responding to the claim that “we know tires and break dust is a cause of autism”. Not “there seems to be a correlation, so maybe we should err on the side of abundant caution and treat it as if it’s causal when drafting public policy.” The correction was warranted.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)