493
People Who Drink Bottled Water on a Daily Basis Ingest 90,000 More Microplastic Particles Each Year (www.wired.com)
submitted 10 months ago by to c/news@lemmy.world
93 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 79 points 10 months ago* (5 children)

"Particles" is almost useless as a measure. They're not movie tickets, I'm not interested in their discreet number. Give me a defined quantity. Is 10,000 particles 1 gram, half a gram, a tenth of a gram, what?

"You're eating far too many particles of salt, we're going to need to to cut back by at least 2,000 particles every lunar cycle."

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 69 points 10 months ago

    It's also meaningless without the context of how many particles other people consume.

    She found that people ingest an average of 39,000 to 52,000 microplastic particles per year from food and drinking water, and those who use bottled water on a daily basis ingest nearly 90,000 more microplastic particles into their bodies.

    Aha! So, now a more informative headline could be something like, "People Who Drink Bottled Water on a Daily Basis Ingest 3 Times as Many Microplastic Particles Each Year."

    Which I would argue is also far scarier than just some out of context bigish number.

    But, I'm with you on ditching "particles" altogether and providing it in a standard measurement.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    Good point. But particle size is also important. Swallow a small sphere of 10g of plastic and it passes through you largely without consequence. 10g of nanoparticles and its in every one of your organs doing god knows what.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago

    Which is kind of what I'm getting at. I've read that we have the equivalent to as much as a crayons worth of micro plastics in our brain. A crayon, while not particularly scientific, puts a pretty fine point on the issue in an intuitive sense, and also addresses the cumulative nature of the pollution. By the head line it seems like they are only talking about a certain sized micro plastic, and without further context they might as well just say "a lot".

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • load more comments (-1 replies)