you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 15 points 10 months ago (16 children)
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    That's because Starbucks is a corporation; they only care about making their number go up. People don't really behave like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    They needed to be heavily taxed thirty years ago.

    They need to be butchered now, for the damage they have done to the earth. They and their heirs must be exterminated to the last. If there is one survivor, all our futures are forfeit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 10 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    There's like a couple thousand billionaires, maybe a couple million of the ultra-wealthy. You wouldn't need a majority

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    Starbucks wastes water by leaving the taps running in its worldwide stores all day. The Starbucks officials defend that practice by saying that the purpose is to clean utensils and meet health standards.

    Well that was a short article that ended abruptly and offered no further details about anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago*

    Yes I quoted the fourth paragraph which was the only paragraph that contained any information. The first few paragraphs were fluff and it was a very short article. I'm happy you say that BBC went into more detail in the original article. That's great.

  • source
  • parent