This is a much cheaper and faster way to get nuclear power.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -11 points 10 months ago (4 children)

they will leave 100% of the cost of the nuclear disposal to the taxpayers.

As opposed to the military handling disposal of the reactor materials... which is paid by... the taxpayers.

You didn't think this comment through every much, or at all really, did you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I trust the military doing it to spec a million times more than any company executives. It’ll probably be left to pollute the area they hide it for decades before taxpayers have to pay for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    The military probably will do better than a private company but also remember that the military has had numerous toxic waste problems. Camp Lejeune’s cancers and all the firefighting PFAs contaminating water supplies are just two i can think of off the top of my head but i’m sure theres many more.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    I think this song epitomises what rafoix replied with

    Safety rules - corners cut
    Just to keep the profits up
    Money saved - profits rise
    But consequence is someone dies

    Victim of a chemical spillage

    Safety regulations breached
    Critical concentrations reached
    Money is saved but a live is lost
    Loved ones left to count the cost

    Tanker crashing the village
    Death could from the spillage
    No escape from the fumes
    Peoples' homes become their tombs

    In the face of corporate greed
    Ecodefence is what we need
    Read and act upon this text
    Or you become the next victim of a chemical spillage

    https://youtu.be/Q3sHdN4f_TI

  • source
  • parent