you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 82 points 10 months ago* (24 children)

This has been known for years (decades?): setting black text against a black background in a PDF doesn't eliminate the text in the PDF. Duh...

The only reason why this is still an idiotic mistake made by public officials is because public officials are idiots.

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 10 months ago (22 children)

    The more I read about what's in some of these files (e.g. a report about Trump being present while a 13yo rape victim's newborn baby was thrown into lake Michigan), the more I'm starting to think it was intentional.

    The people who had to go through this shit to redact it might be fascist pieces of shit, but they're still ostensibly in fields at least somewhat related to law enforcement. Having to read shit like that, and then be complicit in covering it up... I dunno.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    You may never have heard of the AAAA, the Advertisers Against Advertising Alliance..


    Imagine a cigarette-company wants some advertising-work done..

    Imagine that you're dead set against cigarette-companies, but they don't know that..

    Imagine getting the contract, & doing advertising-design for them, where they get an advertising-campaign which to them looks good, but .. doesn't work on people..

    Imagine that that is exactly what you had intended..

    No card-carrying, no meetings, no visible-connections: only independent people contributing independently.

    ( I suspect that the drugstore "Life" brand, at Shopper's Drug Mart was done by a member of the AAAA: NOBODY with health-sense would buy that shit, as a result of the campaign they had, years ago, when I lived in a city )


    Now remap it from AAAA to someone ordered to redact evil, to protect the regime against accountability..

    Imagine you know exactly that this highlighting-with-black won't work..

    Imagine that this is exactly why you use the method: to protect accountability, in a dying-empire's deathspasms..

    It then becomes possible to "do one's job" & be complicit within the regime ( but notice those falsifying-quotes! ),

    while one protects integrity, Justice, & accountability, by doing one's "job" in a way which enables actual-Journalism, should there be any left, to dig-in..


    Beauty, eh?

    _ /\ _

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 10 months ago* (11 children)

    the more I’m starting to think it was intentional

    That's a mistake. Go by Hanlon's razor: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    Hanlon's razor is and has always been bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Is it, though? Has the system been keeping us down, or are the ppl in charge just stupid and greedy? Assigning intent makes the unfairness sting less.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Has the system been keeping us down, or are the ppl in charge just stupid and greedy?

    This is a false choice, it's both. Not all of them are (or were) stupid. But the system is intentionally like this because people are greedy. For money and power.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    Oh, my apologies.

    I didn't realize you were being intractable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    Hold. What. Where do I find this, please?

    I’ve read of the copy/paste unredacting but I’ve yet to read them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    I saw this yesterday (read the tip pdf, not the article), but am having a hard time believing this. Sounds a bit far fetched

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah… after finding out the Nasser letter was fake…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    Yeah this more feels like something else though - tip came through 2020 at peak Epstein hype craze, names multiple high profile individuals in an absurdly grotesque crime, that even if true, they'd likely have "people" for these kinds of clean ups, just doesn't pass the smell test for me.

    Also with the amount of redactions in trump related files this feels like something they "feed" us so that we pull the string until they can prove its a fake to discredit us

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago

    Even if the text is removed, if the font is a proportional one, the very exact dimensions of any removed text plus knowledge of stuff like kerning can reveal the text.

  • source
  • parent