you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

ah, better response.

that unrestrained implementation of such dangerous tech would be implemented in nefarious ways.

Super useful. super dangerous. needs to be implemented with extreme safety rails.

the tool aint bad, people are

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Oh yea? Nefarious? So it's a pretty powerful tool. Bad people will get regardless. And you're building a narrative among your peers that they need to alienate themselves from it. So what I said is spot on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    Youngster, you're very bad at a this.

    No. You don't have a clue what you're saying and still arguing a point that was never made by me.

    Please. Stay focused. If you're anti trump we aren't enemies. If your pro trunk we have issues.

    That is all that matters until we are done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    You're the one not understanding here.

    It's not all that matters.

    My point is the left as a group is alienating and isolating themselves from modern tools that the right are utilizing to gain advantageous.

    They alienate themselves from these tools by making the same virtuosity grand standing about the evils of AI.

    I understand you're saying it's the people using it. To me that is still just driving a wedge in that it creates an attitude that AI is not something the right should adopt since it's a nefarious tool and only people who are bad or nefarious themselves could use a nefarious tool.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Is your argument that we should use generative AI to mislead people? To make fake videos and images and such to use as "proof"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    No my argument is we should make more content and have greater presence digitally instead of allowing the right wing groups like heritage foundation, TPUSA, prageru, project Veritas, ADF, Liberty foundation to capture and engage people while we sit back and complain in the smallest corners online.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I never said anything other than unregulated growth and use would be used for nefarious purposes

    Hopefully That's not a controversial stance? But everything else is your projection

    Good evening

  • source
  • parent