829
AI-generated code contains more bugs and errors than human output (www.techradar.com)
submitted 10 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
204 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 22 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

Although I don't doubt the results… can we have a source for all the numbers presented in this article?

It feels AI generated itself, there's just a mishmash of data with no link to where that data comes from.

There has to be a source, since the author mentions:

So although the study does highlight some of AI's flaws [...] new data from CodeRabbit has claimed

CodeRabbit is an AI code reviewing business. I have zero trust in anything they say on this topic.

Then we get to see who the author is:

Craig’s specific interests lie in technology that is designed to better our lives, including AI and ML, productivity aids, and smart fitness. He is also passionate about cars

Has anyone actually bothered clicking the link and reading past the headline?

Can you please not share / upvote / get ragebaited by dogshit content like this?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    People, especially on lemmy are looking for any cope that Ai will just fall apart by itself and no longer bother them by existing, so they'll upvote whatever lets them think that.

    The reality that we are just heading towards the trough of disappear wherethe investor hype peters off and then we eventually just have a legitimately useful technology with all the same business hurdles of any other technology (tech bros trying to control other peoples lives to enrich themselves or harm people they don't like)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent