▲ 38 ▼ AI image generators have just 12 generic templates (pivot-to-ai.com) submitted 10 months ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems 15 comments fedilink hide all child comments how many three-window rooms can one AI make https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khysGsyK9Qo&list=UU9rJrMVgcXTfa8xuMnbhAEA - video https://pivottoai.libsyn.com/20251222-ai-image-generators-have-just-12-templates - podcast time: 6 min 46 sec
[–] dgerard@awful.systems [S] 8 points 10 months ago (5 children) oh yeah, Suno does the same, it has about 12 songs permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] flaviat@awful.systems 12 points 10 months ago clanker's dozen permalink fedilink source parent [–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 6 points 10 months ago (2 children) Wonder if this is some sort of pre model collapse sign. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] corbin@awful.systems 5 points 10 months ago (1 child) Nah, it's more to do with stationary distributions. Most tokens tend to move towards it; only very surprising tokens can move away. (Insert physics metaphor here.) Most LLM architectures are Markov, so once they get near that distribution they cannot escape on their own. There can easily be hundreds of thousands of orbits near the stationary distribution, each fixated on a simple token sequence and unable to deviate. Moreover, since most LLM architectures have some sort of meta-learning (e.g. attention) they can simulate situations where part of a simulation can get stuck while the rest of it continues, e.g. only one chat participant is stationary and the others are not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 2 points 10 months ago Thanks! permalink fedilink source parent [–] pikesley@mastodon.me.uk 4 points 10 months ago @dgerard @Soyweiser the Randy Newman record? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 6 points 10 months ago (2 children) Wonder if this is some sort of pre model collapse sign. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] corbin@awful.systems 5 points 10 months ago (1 child) Nah, it's more to do with stationary distributions. Most tokens tend to move towards it; only very surprising tokens can move away. (Insert physics metaphor here.) Most LLM architectures are Markov, so once they get near that distribution they cannot escape on their own. There can easily be hundreds of thousands of orbits near the stationary distribution, each fixated on a simple token sequence and unable to deviate. Moreover, since most LLM architectures have some sort of meta-learning (e.g. attention) they can simulate situations where part of a simulation can get stuck while the rest of it continues, e.g. only one chat participant is stationary and the others are not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 2 points 10 months ago Thanks! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] corbin@awful.systems 5 points 10 months ago (1 child) Nah, it's more to do with stationary distributions. Most tokens tend to move towards it; only very surprising tokens can move away. (Insert physics metaphor here.) Most LLM architectures are Markov, so once they get near that distribution they cannot escape on their own. There can easily be hundreds of thousands of orbits near the stationary distribution, each fixated on a simple token sequence and unable to deviate. Moreover, since most LLM architectures have some sort of meta-learning (e.g. attention) they can simulate situations where part of a simulation can get stuck while the rest of it continues, e.g. only one chat participant is stationary and the others are not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 2 points 10 months ago Thanks! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pikesley@mastodon.me.uk 4 points 10 months ago @dgerard @Soyweiser the Randy Newman record? permalink fedilink source parent