Dammit (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone)
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 20 points 10 months ago (7 children)

I think that part is pretty normal, lots of people make deals like that

The crazy part is how he used to call newspapers under false names to talk himself up

Hell, there's a reasonable amount of evidence suggesting that he was never a billionaire (until this year at least), he apparently got on the Forbes list by bugging them until they put him in

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    the crazy part is that Murdoch and Co.'s grip on america is so strong that he has half the country dancing to his tune, through a combination of stupidity and greed (fox/WSJ/majority of "independent" radio stations etc.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Well, that parts not crazy, it's just really depressing.

    Propaganda works, and we really should have written a few more laws to protect independent media before everything calcified into place

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    UK had those laws, but Rupert Murdoch had lunch with Margaret Thatcher right before he purchased the Times of London, giving him a 40% market share in news media in the country. You wanna take a guess on whether those laws were enforced after their little meeting?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    we did have some media-ownership limits couple decades back...

    Bush and Clinton got rid of those

    hence why people say both parties are the same...neolibs and republicans have always had the same end-goal

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Reminds me of the ridiculous advice I've heard from my parents of just showing up to pester the boss at the job you want until they hire you. It may have worked before the days of LinkedIn and Indeed, but these days the people picking out application candidates almost always have nothing to do with the position they're hiring for.

  • source
  • parent