*edited

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 10 months ago

It's hard to see it as anything other than an effective PR campaign for his personal brand. Which likely benefited more than the users of the service. There's a fine line between not letting the perfect be the enemy of the good and also not letting a money hoarding swindler rehabilitate their actions with token gestures. Idk.

  • source
  • parent