5
Ruby Is Not a Serious Programming Language (www.wired.com)
submitted 11 months ago by to c/programming@programming.dev
34 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Ruby survives on affection, not utility. Let's move on.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20251204034843/https://www.wired.com/story/ruby-is-not-a-serious-programming-language/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

Me too. What happened there? I thought it might be because some of my browser extensions block few scripts and other elements. Enabling some of the stuff didn't make reveal the article, so I lost interest. Or is it paid?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    I honestly didn't care enough to spend time looking into it as I'm not being paid to make Wired's website functional. Thankfully, BrikoX was the real MVP and ensured nobody has to actually go there to access the content by posting an archive link.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent