you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 11 months ago (9 children)

@burble @techtakes Why not submerge them in a river for far less money.Microsoft had an underwater datacenter-in-a-container test a while back.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Underwater datacenters make cooling very effective and maintenance nearly impossible, so you have to treat the container data centers essentially disposable. That's only viable with economy of scale big enough to be an xkcd comic punchline. I guess Microsoft found that even they are not quite there yet. Also most computers don't tolerate seawater quite as well as they tolerate air.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    @bitofhope Pretty sure space datacenters are also going to be even more disposable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago

    Oh yea absolutely. Underwater datacenters have one upside (cooling) and massive downsides (everything else, more or less). Space datacenters trade that upside into yet another downside, make the downsides even bigger and add a few extra downsides for good measure.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    Didn't Meta, then Facebook, open a datacenter somewhere in the Arctic circle and leave it exposed to the environmental cold? Until the planet runs out of cold, an eventuality whose impending rapidity I'd rather not ponder, that seems a viable approach.

  • source
  • parent