The countries committed to permanently ending fossil fuel use now far outnumber those against. Their problem? Their chief organising conference, the 30-year-old COP conferences, comes with vetoes from the petro-states. This year, 1,600 fossil industry lobbyists attended, and they managed to get any mention of fossil fuels scrubbed from the final agreement.

This ridiculous state of affairs can't continue, and this is a classic move to break the deadlock. Sideline COP & the petrostates, by creating an alternative, they don't have power in.

The first ever International Conference on the Just Transition Away from Fossil Fuels, scheduled for April 2026.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 11 months ago* (8 children)

feel free to take it up with the countries buying it, or is it just the west that has to reduce its dependence on coal?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    3rd world countries that need cheap energy are to blame instead of one of the richest countries selling stuff because it wants to be richer?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    if they need cheap energy renewables are the cheapest, especially with the 3rd worlds links to China, building coal power plants is just ignorance

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    So they all(!) do not know better and use more expensive stuff why?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    If Australia stops selling coal, it will get more expensive and other countries will have more reasons to use renewables

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    renewables are already the cheapest form of power, there's no excuse to be building new coal power plants in 2025

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments