you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 67 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Well if people started calling it for what it is, weighted random text generator, then maybe they'd stop relying on it for anything serious...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I call it enhanced autocomplete. We all know how inaccurate autocomplete is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago* (2 children)

    I wonder how a keyboard with those enhanched autocomplete would be to use...clearly if the autocomplete is used locally and the app is open source

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    there are voice to text apps that run a model on your phone. a few more cores on our devices or some more optimisations to the models and we can run an LLM. The problem is battery life and heat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago*

    I once runned some models on my phone thruh termux. I tried to run Llama 3.2 with 1 and 3B parameters and run pretty well, i tried 8B and was slow. I tried deepseek-r1, 1.5B and run well, 7B was slow.

    For text prediction llama 1B may be enough

    Now, this is on a 300/400€ phone (Honor magic 6 lite)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 11 months ago*

    Yeah, my point was more this doesn't have to do anything with AI or the technology itself. I mean whether AI is good or bad or doesn't really work... Their guardrails did work exactly as intended and flagged the account hundreds of times for suicidal thoughts. At least according to these articles. So it's more a business decision to not intervene and has little to do with what AI is and what it can do.

    (Unless the system comes with too many false positives. That'd be a problem with technology. But this doesn't seem to be discussed in any form.)

  • source
  • parent