The drama and accusations the GrapheneOS developers are spewing and engaging in are giving me a bad taste in the mouth and make me doubt the OS’s reliability am I the only one?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 51 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (8 children)

While I do find GOS drama a bit annoying, they aren't wrong about the lacking security of many AOSP forks. iode and /e/OS have a history late patches for security vulnerabilities in both the OS (https://web.archive.org/web/20241231003546/https://divestos.org/pages/patch_history) and for the forked apps they bundle with it. Each Android monthly and Chromium patches usually contains dozens High Risk CVEs, so taking a month or 2 is unacceptable. Neither are good for privacy or security.

See a comparison between some Android ROMs here, especially noting the update speed section: https://eylenburg.github.io/android_comparison.htm

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    I understand security implications but I'll be getting Fairphone 6 with /e/OS over Pixel with GrapheneOS. For me FOSS ranks higher than HW security features, and buying Google device goes against FOSS principles.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    Not being familiar with the controveries referenced in this thread....

    All of this reminds me very much of OpenBSD and Theo de Radt (?) back in the 98-02 era.

    OpenBSD is certainly not the most popular *nix today, but it's probably the most secure.

  • source
  • parent