you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think the LA times wrote a piece about this in the past day or two, the doctoring was done when Trump took office and had the Justice Department redact all references to him "as a private citizen" which is some bullshit. But look at what's already come through, thousands of pages with hundreds of references to Trump, unredacted and incriminating, I wonder if the idiots he hired to scour through the files actually did it, or just cashed their checks and ran like the rest of Elon's DOGE bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's safe to assume anything redacted is Trump. They have the burden of proof to say it's not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "It's not Trump."

    "Okay, prove it!"

    "UM... oh look, a squirrel!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    If only it were that easy. A conversation with one of them would go something more like this:

    "It's not Trump."

    "Okay, prove it!"

    "I don't need to because THIS IS AMERICA, and it's INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY."

    "Like the people arrested by ICE?"

    "THEY WERE CRIMINALS!"

    "Even the 93% without criminal records?"

    "THAT'S FAKE NEWS, LIBTARD"

  • source
  • parent