What, that focusing solely on electric cars are not the solution to climate change and is only a band-aid? No, it's the truth.

You're changing the goalposts. I was clearly referring to the quoted portion of your assertion that electric cars are a net negative for climate change.

This is false:

Electric Cars which net doesn't help and in fact worsens our e-waste issue.

It's better than ice cars in the short run, but you guys really need to focus on other, more practical solutions like better public transports and less car-centric infrastructure and laws.

Thank you for the advice on how the US should operate. Good points that no one has ever considered.

Cities, states, and regions have been and are continuing to improve the public transit infrastructure. The problem exists primarily at the federal level, as well as cost, local zoning, eminent domain and the lawsuits that follow, and certain state and federal environmental laws that result in lengthy studies and more lawsuits.

These are all factors that have slowed down the California High-Speed Rail Project, for example. The goal is for it is to eventually connect every major city in California to high-speed rail (and Las Vegas via another high-speed rail line, Brightline West). Excluding Las Vegas, the total length of track is roughly the length of Belgium to Poland. And that's half of one state.

The Northeast is already covered in rail. Going from city to city is easier that way, even though it's not high speed. NYC to DC is 3.5 hours and requires no cars, door to door. This works because of density, the same reason it works in Europe and Asia. The US is very large and doesn't have density everywhere. Building and maintaining the 4,500 km of high-speed rail track necessary to connect Los Angeles to NYC is expensive and difficult. That's Lisbon to Moscow.