Well, not all the way evenly. It's fine to have relatively rich and poor. Money should be a measure of what your society owes you, and society owes my doctor more than it owes my deadbeat... whatever, who just doesn't want to get a job.

Make that doctor as many lattes and avocado toasts as he wants.

Everyone working 40 hours a week should be able to ask their neighbors for things like "take my garbage from the curb to the dump" or "educate my kids" or "make me a sandwich". That is the concept of money at its core.

We'll say the going rate for a skilled worker is $100k a year with a working lifetime of ~40 years, about $4m in total. Ain't nobody out there that deserves the lifetime's work of 250 people working solely for them, 40 hours a week, ~44 weeks a year. (That's about a billion dollars.) Yeah, maybe you can control that many people or more if you're working towards a common purpose and providing value for others, but that would be a billion dollars in gross income that's redistributed, not net profit for one person.