Linux Questions

linuxquestions@lemmy.zip

4,352 readers

109 active

2 users here now

Linux questions Rules (in addition of the Lemmy.zip rules)

stay on topic
be nice (no name calling)
do not post long blocks of text such as logs
do not delete your posts
only post questions (no information posts)

Tips for giving and receiving help

be as clear and specific
say thank you if a solution works
verify your solutions before posting them as facts.

Any rule violations will result in disciplinary actions

founded 3 years ago

moderation log

moderators

possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip

How do you feel about Flatpak? Do you like having universal packages separated from the operating system, or do you regret how much space they take? (piefed.zip)

submitted 1 year ago by Blaze@piefed.zip to c/linuxquestions@lemmy.zip

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I was reading a bit about it recently, seems like there two positions are valid, curious to see what people here think.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Samueru_sama@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

You can have universal packages separated from the system that use very little space. That is known as AppImage

And now it is possible to make them truly universal, before appimage sucked since they had a dependency to libfuse2 and glibc, that's not needed anymore.

permalink

fedilink

source