▲ 23 ▼ Bonne st jean. (lemmy.ca) submitted 1 year ago by frankyboi@lemmy.ca to c/fbstolencontent@lemmy.ca 10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 1 year ago (9 children) whys everything gotta be AI now :( permalink fedilink source hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago* (8 children) What makes you think this is AI? Because i dont think it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 1 year ago (7 children) theres a lot of inconsistencies and details that an actual artist wouldn't do, especially on her clothes. you can see the strings on her skirt and her necklace kinda fade in and out of existence. but the biggest giveaway is definitely the flag she's holding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) Taking as comparison the fingers, maybe rhe art style of the artist is simply crude? Also what about the flag? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 2 points 1 year ago Puppycat appears to mean through another comment that the symbols being distorted, or at least different from each other, are signs of a generated image. Having some experience with doodling myself, even if very sporadically, I think such a small detail is a major PITA to make perfect, so it feels pretty human-like to me. permalink fedilink source parent [–] puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) um.. i feel like the flag is pretty self explanatory?? thats a pretty perfect textbook example of what to look for, unless the artist very very deliberately wanted their art style to look ai generated. which they have done an insanely good job at doing if so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 6 points 1 year ago Dunno what is your expected level of alleged human-like quality, but taking myself as example, when I want to doodle something and a detail is overly small or unecessarily hard to do, unless I copy-paste the given detail through software, I just go the simplified route. So to me, it looks very like it's human-made. permalink fedilink source parent [–] frankyboi@lemmy.ca [S] 1 point 1 year ago Look like someone with bad drawing skills. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago* (8 children) What makes you think this is AI? Because i dont think it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 1 year ago (7 children) theres a lot of inconsistencies and details that an actual artist wouldn't do, especially on her clothes. you can see the strings on her skirt and her necklace kinda fade in and out of existence. but the biggest giveaway is definitely the flag she's holding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) Taking as comparison the fingers, maybe rhe art style of the artist is simply crude? Also what about the flag? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 2 points 1 year ago Puppycat appears to mean through another comment that the symbols being distorted, or at least different from each other, are signs of a generated image. Having some experience with doodling myself, even if very sporadically, I think such a small detail is a major PITA to make perfect, so it feels pretty human-like to me. permalink fedilink source parent [–] puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) um.. i feel like the flag is pretty self explanatory?? thats a pretty perfect textbook example of what to look for, unless the artist very very deliberately wanted their art style to look ai generated. which they have done an insanely good job at doing if so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 6 points 1 year ago Dunno what is your expected level of alleged human-like quality, but taking myself as example, when I want to doodle something and a detail is overly small or unecessarily hard to do, unless I copy-paste the given detail through software, I just go the simplified route. So to me, it looks very like it's human-made. permalink fedilink source parent [–] frankyboi@lemmy.ca [S] 1 point 1 year ago Look like someone with bad drawing skills. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 1 year ago (7 children) theres a lot of inconsistencies and details that an actual artist wouldn't do, especially on her clothes. you can see the strings on her skirt and her necklace kinda fade in and out of existence. but the biggest giveaway is definitely the flag she's holding. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) Taking as comparison the fingers, maybe rhe art style of the artist is simply crude? Also what about the flag? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 2 points 1 year ago Puppycat appears to mean through another comment that the symbols being distorted, or at least different from each other, are signs of a generated image. Having some experience with doodling myself, even if very sporadically, I think such a small detail is a major PITA to make perfect, so it feels pretty human-like to me. permalink fedilink source parent [–] puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) um.. i feel like the flag is pretty self explanatory?? thats a pretty perfect textbook example of what to look for, unless the artist very very deliberately wanted their art style to look ai generated. which they have done an insanely good job at doing if so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 6 points 1 year ago Dunno what is your expected level of alleged human-like quality, but taking myself as example, when I want to doodle something and a detail is overly small or unecessarily hard to do, unless I copy-paste the given detail through software, I just go the simplified route. So to me, it looks very like it's human-made. permalink fedilink source parent [–] frankyboi@lemmy.ca [S] 1 point 1 year ago Look like someone with bad drawing skills. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) Taking as comparison the fingers, maybe rhe art style of the artist is simply crude? Also what about the flag? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 2 points 1 year ago Puppycat appears to mean through another comment that the symbols being distorted, or at least different from each other, are signs of a generated image. Having some experience with doodling myself, even if very sporadically, I think such a small detail is a major PITA to make perfect, so it feels pretty human-like to me. permalink fedilink source parent [–] puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) um.. i feel like the flag is pretty self explanatory?? thats a pretty perfect textbook example of what to look for, unless the artist very very deliberately wanted their art style to look ai generated. which they have done an insanely good job at doing if so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 6 points 1 year ago Dunno what is your expected level of alleged human-like quality, but taking myself as example, when I want to doodle something and a detail is overly small or unecessarily hard to do, unless I copy-paste the given detail through software, I just go the simplified route. So to me, it looks very like it's human-made. permalink fedilink source parent [–] frankyboi@lemmy.ca [S] 1 point 1 year ago Look like someone with bad drawing skills. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 2 points 1 year ago Puppycat appears to mean through another comment that the symbols being distorted, or at least different from each other, are signs of a generated image. Having some experience with doodling myself, even if very sporadically, I think such a small detail is a major PITA to make perfect, so it feels pretty human-like to me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 2 points 1 year ago Puppycat appears to mean through another comment that the symbols being distorted, or at least different from each other, are signs of a generated image. Having some experience with doodling myself, even if very sporadically, I think such a small detail is a major PITA to make perfect, so it feels pretty human-like to me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) um.. i feel like the flag is pretty self explanatory?? thats a pretty perfect textbook example of what to look for, unless the artist very very deliberately wanted their art style to look ai generated. which they have done an insanely good job at doing if so. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 6 points 1 year ago Dunno what is your expected level of alleged human-like quality, but taking myself as example, when I want to doodle something and a detail is overly small or unecessarily hard to do, unless I copy-paste the given detail through software, I just go the simplified route. So to me, it looks very like it's human-made. permalink fedilink source parent [–] frankyboi@lemmy.ca [S] 1 point 1 year ago Look like someone with bad drawing skills. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 6 points 1 year ago Dunno what is your expected level of alleged human-like quality, but taking myself as example, when I want to doodle something and a detail is overly small or unecessarily hard to do, unless I copy-paste the given detail through software, I just go the simplified route. So to me, it looks very like it's human-made. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frankyboi@lemmy.ca [S] 1 point 1 year ago Look like someone with bad drawing skills. permalink fedilink source parent