▲ 842 ▼ The problem is older than I thought... (sh.itjust.works) submitted 1 year ago by trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works to c/iiiiiiitttttttttttt@programming.dev 84 comments fedilink hide all child comments I guess now we finally know why Babbage never finished building the Analytical Engine.
[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 144 points 1 year ago (7 children) Ada Lovelace invented coding on that thing btw permalink fedilink source hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] bluGill@fedia.io 164 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children) And then had the wisdom to die before a computer capable of running her programs was invented, thus saving the bother of having to debug them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] notabot@piefed.social 47 points 1 year ago Writes code. Realises that debugging code that was written by the lunatic that is yourself two nights ago is going to be a big part of her life. dies We've all had debugging sessions where that feels like the best option. Right? permalink fedilink source parent [–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago I wouldnt have done anything different permalink fedilink source parent [–] Deceptichum 21 points 1 year ago (1 child) Debugging was easier when all you had to do was spray the room with fly spray and vacuum the tubes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works [S] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) Just that the Analytical Engine she'd have had to debug was all gears and levers and cranks and linkages and shit. One wrong move and it'll take off a finger, or a hand, or more. In hindsight, if modern computers were like this, probably users would be different, too... permalink fedilink source parent [–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) I realize you jest, but I bet she did actually debug them by running through them by hand. I've found and fixed many bugs via code review without actually running into the bug during a run. Plus wtf else was there to do in the 1800s? Debugging might have been relatively highly entertaining in those days. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bluGill@fedia.io 5 points 1 year ago I'm sure she did. I've also heard that when computers could run her code existed someone tried to run her programs and found several simple bugs that had not been seen before even though they are obvious. (I don't know how to verify that claim but it wouldn't surprise me) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bluGill@fedia.io 164 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children) And then had the wisdom to die before a computer capable of running her programs was invented, thus saving the bother of having to debug them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] notabot@piefed.social 47 points 1 year ago Writes code. Realises that debugging code that was written by the lunatic that is yourself two nights ago is going to be a big part of her life. dies We've all had debugging sessions where that feels like the best option. Right? permalink fedilink source parent [–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago I wouldnt have done anything different permalink fedilink source parent [–] Deceptichum 21 points 1 year ago (1 child) Debugging was easier when all you had to do was spray the room with fly spray and vacuum the tubes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works [S] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) Just that the Analytical Engine she'd have had to debug was all gears and levers and cranks and linkages and shit. One wrong move and it'll take off a finger, or a hand, or more. In hindsight, if modern computers were like this, probably users would be different, too... permalink fedilink source parent [–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) I realize you jest, but I bet she did actually debug them by running through them by hand. I've found and fixed many bugs via code review without actually running into the bug during a run. Plus wtf else was there to do in the 1800s? Debugging might have been relatively highly entertaining in those days. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bluGill@fedia.io 5 points 1 year ago I'm sure she did. I've also heard that when computers could run her code existed someone tried to run her programs and found several simple bugs that had not been seen before even though they are obvious. (I don't know how to verify that claim but it wouldn't surprise me) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] notabot@piefed.social 47 points 1 year ago Writes code. Realises that debugging code that was written by the lunatic that is yourself two nights ago is going to be a big part of her life. dies We've all had debugging sessions where that feels like the best option. Right? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago I wouldnt have done anything different permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Deceptichum 21 points 1 year ago (1 child) Debugging was easier when all you had to do was spray the room with fly spray and vacuum the tubes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works [S] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) Just that the Analytical Engine she'd have had to debug was all gears and levers and cranks and linkages and shit. One wrong move and it'll take off a finger, or a hand, or more. In hindsight, if modern computers were like this, probably users would be different, too... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works [S] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) Just that the Analytical Engine she'd have had to debug was all gears and levers and cranks and linkages and shit. One wrong move and it'll take off a finger, or a hand, or more. In hindsight, if modern computers were like this, probably users would be different, too... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) I realize you jest, but I bet she did actually debug them by running through them by hand. I've found and fixed many bugs via code review without actually running into the bug during a run. Plus wtf else was there to do in the 1800s? Debugging might have been relatively highly entertaining in those days. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bluGill@fedia.io 5 points 1 year ago I'm sure she did. I've also heard that when computers could run her code existed someone tried to run her programs and found several simple bugs that had not been seen before even though they are obvious. (I don't know how to verify that claim but it wouldn't surprise me) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bluGill@fedia.io 5 points 1 year ago I'm sure she did. I've also heard that when computers could run her code existed someone tried to run her programs and found several simple bugs that had not been seen before even though they are obvious. (I don't know how to verify that claim but it wouldn't surprise me) permalink fedilink source parent