you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

Communism is an economic and political ideology of "workers owning the rights and means to productions" as opposed to investors and upper management not specifically beholden to those workers, so yes publicly owned services and also cooperatives are "communism".

That's not to say that communism is in any way a solution to the problems of greed or corruption, though, because centralized authorities managing those public goods and services can be as bad or even worse than a monopoly.

My stance is plainly that communism or capitalism is a pointless discussion to even have on the topics of inequality, civil rights, or wealth concentration because it makes no difference compared to the discussion of democracy vs antidemocratic ideologies like fascism or tankies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    You can add things to the definitions of words all you like but it just puts you on the same level as those tankies screaming bloody murder about Capitalism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    By definitions of words capitalism and communism are not conflicting ideologies unless applied to the extreme.

    The dictionaries tell us this:

    Capitalism means private ownership of production of goods and services.

    Communism means worker owned production of goods and services.

    Obviously you could argue that all Capitalism is Laissez Faire and that all communism is some abominable mix of Marxism and somehow dictatorship, but then we have no terms to describe the 99% of industries that fall anywhere in the middle as anything except "market system."

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)