Games

games@sh.itjust.works

26,520 readers

1,410 active

309 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 3 years ago

moderation log

moderators

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

Japan Patent Office rejects Nintendo application relevant to Palworld dispute, cites games like ARK as prior art after third-party submission (gamesfray.com)

submitted 1 year ago by misk@piefed.social to c/games@sh.itjust.works

52 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

Wouldn’t you want to skip Nintendo games so that they stop being culturally relevant? I often hear that piracy is good for media creators in the long run.

This is the message we were replying to

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] stray@pawb.social 1 point 1 year ago

Yes, the one responding to a suggestion to pirate their games, which directly references piracy in the quote you pasted.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent