245
'Valve does not get anywhere near enough criticism': DayZ creator Dean Hall says the 'gambling mechanics' of Valve's monetization strategy 'have absolutely no place' in videogames (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
67 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Valve, however, has managed to neatly skirt regulatory efforts by charging players not for directly purchasing loot crates, which can be earned during gameplay, but for the keys required to open them.

Wow, that's fucking scummy

Hall said that even he is frustrated by the "Paradox model" of paid expansion and DLC packs his studio RocketWerkz chose for its survival game Icarus after moving away from a free-to-play scheme.

For Paradox games, it's mostly nickel and diming since they know they're working in a niche market. For Icarus, it's a problem of wanting the game to stay relevant, paying for servers and not knowing when to say "ok, we're done".

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Valve loot boxes have always worked that way. They didn't change them to skirt regulations. I don't really find it very scummy at all. Nothing in the loot boxes can give you an advantage in the game. Most of the games that include this feature are free to play. This is how they make money from their game. The vast majority of people don't pay very much at all. You can play the games and have tons of fun and never interact with the loot box system. It's an optional thing for people who like the game so much that they want to pay. It's basically donate to valve and have a chance to unlock a cosmetic item in game.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago*

    This completely ignores the fact that teenagers play the game, it’s essentially gambling, streamers spending decent time opening cases, FOMO, the status that comes with rare skins, skin markets and so on. I sorta of get what you’re saying insofar as not being PTW and cosmetics being the least obnoxious of this type of practice but it’s still super scummy. To the exclusion of CS2 and maybe a handful of other being free is the point, so they can get you into the slot machine that is these sort of mechanics and squeeze money from people (mostly kids). Don’t get me started on Valve generating billions from this and CS2 is still a mess.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Some good points. I can't remember where I saw this, but a game recently made their loot boxes randomly generate loot which was then shown to the player who had the choice of whether or not to open a box. This is much better than blindly opening boxes where you won't know whether or not you will want the item inside.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Hall said that even he is frustrated by the "Paradox model" of paid expansion and DLC packs his studio RocketWerkz chose for its survival game Icarus after moving away from a free-to-play scheme.

    That pretty rich given how many DLCs Icarus has. He's not wrong, but also shut the fuck up Dean, you've managed to ruin every game you built through incessant content updates no one wanted.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent