Pulse of Truth

2,615 readers

1,102 active

65 users here now

Cyber Security news and links to cyber security stories that could make you go hmmm. The content is exactly as it is consumed through RSS feeds and wont be edited (except for the occasional encoding errors).

This community is automagically fed by an instance of Dittybopper.

Commenting rules:

Be respectful.
No bigotry (including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia).
No pornography.
Nothing illegal.
More rules will be added when necessary

founded 3 years ago

moderation log

moderators

krogoth@infosec.pub

‘There isn’t really another choice:’ Signal chief explains why the encrypted messenger relies on AWS (www.theverge.com)

submitted 1 year ago by lemmydev2@infosec.pub [B] to c/pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

After last week’s major Amazon Web Services (AWS) outage took Signal along with it, Elon Musk was quick to criticize the encrypted messaging app’s reliance on big tech. But Signal president Meredith Whittaker argues that the company didn’t have any other choice but to use AWS or another major cloud provider. “The problem here is […]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

because they can barely keep the lights on with one provider. but I'm sure you will be a long-term signal backup subscriber, and until then you are regularly sending them donations.

https://signal.org/blog/signal-is-expensive/

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[+] MotoAsh@piefed.social -7 points 1 year ago

rofl how pathetic of a response. This is similar to the, "let's see you make better" from someone saying, "this food tastes like shit."

How is using multiple providers such a massive increase in expense? They'd be able to share the load, so it doesn't have to be a doubling of expense or even necessarily a significant increase in any universe what so ever.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent