Bacon and ham sold in the UK should carry cigarette-style labels warning that chemicals in them cause bowel cancer, scientists say.

Their demand comes as they criticise successive British governments for doing “virtually nothing” to reduce the risk from nitrites in the decade since they were found to definitely cause cancer.

Saturday marks a decade since the World Health Organization in October 2015 declared processed meat declared processed meat to be carcinogenic to humans, putting it in the same category as tobacco and asbestos.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 1 year ago (18 children)

put the cancer warnings, like smoking people will still consume it.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (10 children)

    A bunch of the stuff I buy has CA cancer warnings on it. When you start putting the warnings on common things, it makes the warnings meaningless...

    Do any of the things I buy have a notable chance to cause caner? I have no fucking clue, because everything causes cancer in California.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago*

    That's something I've noticed too. There's not really any information about what parts of something to avoid or what the risk is or how you'd come into contact with it, but I remember seeing it everywhere when I lived there too, and I was like

    "Everything in California including California is known to the state of California to cause cancer and reproductive harm."

    I'm not saying it shouldn't be there at all, but at least wish it was a bit more like Material Safety Data Sheets that gives a bit more understanding to what you're getting into by interacting with various things.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Let me ask for fun, does toothpaste have a warning?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You know, I can't remember any toothpaste with that warning. So, win one for us I guess! ;p

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Imagine brushing your teeth with a ‘may cause cancer’ warning. You think people would even care or just ignore it? ignorance is bliss is real

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    id still do it. mabye my teeth would glow.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Does that come with superpowers? I'd be brushing twice a day

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Yeah but imagine having to explain to your daughter at breakfast, "Daddy, what's that on the label? What's cancer?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    "Don't worry about it, honey. This is just more government bullshit, like with COVID and Brexit. The Muslims are trying to make eating pork illegal. Have an extra portion. Don't let them tell you what to do."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    This is just more government bullshit

    Just like the California cancer label that is on everything, if you put this label on common shit like bacon, then yes, "it's just more government bullshit" is exactly how the vast majority of people will treat it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I've seen the "California cancer label" line get tossed around. And its beginning to sound a lot like the "McDonalds Coffee Lawsuit" line, which was - itself - a dishonest mischaracterization of a severe injury caused by corporate neglect.

    I'd say it cuts both ways. If you label everything "hazardous", you're absolutely right. The term loses all meaning. But, at the same time, if we live in a marketplace where everything is hazardous then the theory "we'll just put a label on it and let the consumer decide" of patriarchal libertarianism falls apart. What is supposed to be informative becomes little more than marketing material.

    The real problem is industrial. Mass production of stuff that delivers a short-term jolt of pleasure at a long term health cost, because the manufacturers consider it more profitable than releasing products with a shorter shelf life or a lower addictive quality or a more expensive production cost.

    Oops, now everything needs a label, because the folks producing this shit don't care that all their products are horrible.

  • source
  • parent