Programmer Humor

programmer_humor@programming.dev

34,028 readers

8,214 active

826 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

Keep content in english
No advertisements
Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
- If the mod doesn't find it funny, you're banned. Ha-ha!... For real: do not use the community for "statements". There are other places for such content. Keep it chill and funny.

founded 3 years ago

moderation log

moderators

anzo@programming.dev

Feyter@programming.dev

BurningTurtle@programming.dev

pylapp@programming.dev

It was (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by lb_o@lemmy.world to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

getting two computers to talk to each other is so so much harder due to NAT traversal

... which is why you will take IPv4 on my home network from my cold, dead hands, and why all IPv6 traffic is blocked in the network that hosts my PC/laptop

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thanks for holding us back, champ.

I guess fuck stateful packet inspection as a tool or anything.

NAT isn't a security measure you know that right?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com 8 points 1 year ago

So you admit you can block IPv6 traffic in your rebuke to IPv6 adoption. What’s then the issue? Block what you want, it’s your network, but do it with a firewall and not NAT.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent