you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Right?! I agree with the vibe, but I was hoping for more detail, a link to the study, etc... But the article just ends with this incredibly vague statement and no sources:

"This article is based on verified sources and supported by editorial technologies."

🤷‍♂️

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago*

    When I see this type of thing my default assumption is the actual source is ChatGPT. The article is attributed to "the editorial team" but that link just goes to a list of other articles and credits no-one. But somehow they're putting out like 20 a day, all of them similarly lacking sources or authors, and only linking to other articles on the same site. Plus the writing style is full of AI-isms.

  • source
  • parent