you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 36 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Aren't the pot smokers more mellow and less likely to fight/shoot/kill someone. I think drinkers stand a better chance of violence. How about we leave both groups alone. Case closed ... next?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    I think the issue should be pretty cut and dry. You can drink as often as you want and own guns. You can't go out shooting while you're drinking. You should be able to smoke whenever you want as long as you're not inebriated when you're shooting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    You can’t go out shooting while you’re drinking.

    Try telling that to the old farts at the trap range.

    I knew one club shooting president who really, really wanted to ban drinking while using any of the ranges. The culture of having a beer while shooting was too entrenched, and the loss of membership numbers from the old guys leaving would have put the club out of business. So it was only banned on the pistol/rifle ranges. Had to leave trap and skeet as they were.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Chill dude, you're calling out "straw man" like I'm disagreeing with you. I'm saying that the rules should work the same way. There's no reason people that smoke should be banned from gun ownership, just like people who drink aren't banned.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments