you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's also silly for the orgs to not have geographic redundancy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    No it's not. It's very expensive to run and there are a lot of edge cases. It's much easier to have regional redundancy for a fraction of the cost.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    The organizations they were talking about and I was referring to have a global presence

    Plus, it's not significantly more expensive to have a cold standby in a different geographic location in AWS.

  • source
  • parent