you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 1 year ago* (18 children)

I remember reading a comment saying that women don't actually want pockets. The manufacturers and retailers have data on this.

What's happening is the women who do want them are in online bubbles that give them the impression that most women want pockets.

It's like how most gamers don't give a shit about DRM, so those of us who know better are stuck with it anyway.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    The only data I could find suggests women do want pockets, particularly in pants.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Is the hypothesis that companies have their customers' best interests in mind? /shrug I'm just going to base my worldview on the only data I could find rather than "I remember reading a comment." At least until I run across new data.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 1 year ago* (4 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Planned obsolescence, subscription degradation, ad creep, landfills full of cheap crap... It's in their interests to sell the least useful thing for the highest price. If it costs more to put in pockets, they'll spend a surprising amount of money trying to convince people they don't want pockets. Or better yet, just buy up every competitor until there are only a few players and decide amongst yourselves not to make better stuff. I'm not saying that's what happened, necessarily, it's just not a foregone conclusion that pockets are scarce because demand is scarce.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    So you've got a very vocal market calling out their demand for a product that is more or less trivial to manufacture, and yet not a single entrepreneur has successfully brought the product to market. Why would that be?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    A quick search confirms that women's clothing with pockets does in fact exist, so the niche is getting served.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    It takes significantly more time in shopping. Online, the normal look at 25 items to find one that matches my style preferences and is available in my size, then add clicking through all the product detail tabs to try to figure out if it has pockets, 80% of them don't, and of the ones that do it's mostly hope that they aren't poorly designed where everything falls out of them upon sitting down.

    I appreciate that, with a multiple of the shopping time investment required by men or women who don't value pockets, and some fallout in unusable pockets, women's clothing with pockets is available. But I sure wish it was more available.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    My SIL doesn't want pockets, but she is wealthy and into style. I think some of the women who don't want pockets are into style and/or looking wealthy enough to not need pockets.

    Women who are pragmatic want pockets.

    I've been ripping open pockets and sewing more fabric onto them making them big.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I became aware of this once in the office where a woman brought up the fact that guys were lucky to have functional pockets. Most pockets on womans clothing are either fake or are sewn shut and for looks.

    I asked why? And she explained it ruins the "Pants Chi". I guess it gets in the way of showing off the figure somehow.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)