I guess my question is who gave the Americans the right? I say this as an American. But would not the world be a better place if we just minded our own business and quit nation building and stoking non existant fires?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 1 year ago (7 children)

The main reason is that if we stop being the biggest shark in the tank, the next two biggest sharks (China and Russia) can't be trusted to not feast on the smaller sharks. And if they do feast, they will become too large for the American shark to deal with.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The US is already feeding on the smaller sharks, and has been for decades. Look at their foreign policy in Central and South America, South East Asia, the Middle East.

    The only difference is that they've been feasting on other nations and not the West. China and Russia don't have those restraints. All three of them are horrible, but America hasn't been horrible to us until just recently.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago

    for decades

    Centuries*.

    China and Russia don’t have those restraints

    I understand why you'd say that about modern Russia, but how on Earth are you comparing China to the USA? In what war has China been in the past 40 years? What countries has it been exploiting?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I think it's even simpler than this. I think any government/state/group with power wants to hold and expand it. I'm not sure there is a group of people that exist that wouldn't work to exercise control if they could. And I'm not defending the US, I just think it may be an inherently human thing to do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I think any government/state/group with power wants to hold and expand it

    Then you'd be wrong. Famously, after the Russian Revolution in 1917, the Russian Socialist Federation of Soviet Republics, under the leadership of the Bolsheviks, created the first constitution in history that granted the unilateral right of self-determination and secession to all peoples of the former Russian Empire. This is how Poland gained its independence in 1918, as well as Finland and many other countries formerly part of the Russian Empire. Interesting episode of history.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    So how did they get from 1918 to 1968?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    In 1918 Poland decided to unilaterally invade modern Ukraine and Belarus because of nationalist expansionist beliefs, you can read about it on the wikipedia article or the Polish-Ukrainian war.

    In 1939 the Soviet Union recovered those territories and gave them back to the Belarusian and Ukrainian SSRs, which Poles are still crying about. If you care about seeing maps representing this I can give you sources no problem since I'm arguing from good faith.

    After 1945, Poland was forced by the USSR to give reparations in order to compensate for the lack of mutual defense agreement against Nazis before 1939, which was a mistaken policy that led to a lot of insatisfaction in Poland. After the mid-1950s, the Soviet Union removed these reparations and instead started subsidising the Polish socialist nation with cheap resources and industrialising it.

    What part of 1969 is relevant to you?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    I'm sorry, this seems to imply the US doesn't "feast on the smaller sharks". It went as far as threatening Japan with sanctions because they were considering "digital sovereignty" with TRON OS as opposed to Windows at some point. Japan is almost a non-optional ally.

    And also one good solution of preventing someone from doing that is arming the smaller sharks. Yet USA seems even more against more equal spread of technologies and weapons than the "next two sharks".

  • source
  • parent