you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 year ago (18 children)

My goal isnt to string together a coherent idealist take, it is to find material oppression that actually harm people, and meet people there in the fight against oppression that affects us both. I dont always succeed, but I try very hard and dedicate a lot of time and energy talking to people and learning from their experiences rather than putting others in a box.

My take on the ice cream industry is that the largest companies should be publicly owned and the profits redistributed to the public good, including reparations for historic victims of slavery, targeted racial violence and disenfranchisement, because not doing so is an affront to my own freedom, and to everyone's freedom, except a wealthy few.

But honestly most grocery store foods are owned by only 2 companies who have incentives to make food worse and more expensive so they can increase their own profits. In the mean time, we get sicker.

You seem more preoccupied with racism than I am. I just want people to have a fair shot at a good life. A lot of the arguments you are making sound to me like someone who doesn't think they can get ahead without some cop taking out others. Your own views are proof of the violence I am referring to, as your arguments are a textbook example of how people act when they feel threatened. If there wasn't a worse prison to place others in, you might see your own conditions as a prison and try to escape them. I'm just trying to help you see the cage we are all in, and the reasons we are in it.

Maybe that's futile, but I'm an optimist in that way

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (17 children)

    You seem more preoccupied with racism than I am.

    How so?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (16 children)

    To me, racism is an objective social condition to overcome. Race has a quality that is very personal to people so it can't be overlooked. I take it very seriously but I dont want to reduce all society's problems to race. You seem aware that doing so creates its own problems, I agree with the sentiment but does not warrant complete dismissal of race and racism as objective social conditions. It is an over correction.

    Because of this over correction, you see racism and anti-racism as qualities of the other, in this case, i am an other with an anti-racist quality.

    Rather than fighting a system of racism, that exists as part of a larger system of oppression, you seem to have adopted a posture that any mention of race or racism is a personal failing, an idea that can be defeated with individual logic, rather than an objective condition to be fought with solidarity and practice. Because racism is everywhere, you see anti-racism everywhere, but since it is, to you, only an individual opinion in other people, your only course of action is to respond to them one-on-one. In order to avoid appearing explicitly racist, and to effectively .debate your own alienated opinions against others, you have to steel man and think about this stuff all the time.

    I don't have to do that. I just listen to people, read books, and report on my own limited understanding. I don't have to work half as hard because my perspective doesn't disappear other people's experiences, it naturally includes them. I don't have to search frantically for details to question, or ways to feel superior. I can just listen and discuss. If done correctly I don't frustrate myself or other people nearly as much, I can just be dumb and live my life and speak my mind, and if there's something new I need to learn, I can just do that instead of frantically rejecting objective truth in order to maintain attachment to a system that hates and oppresses us.

    I can have strong principles and take care of my friends and family, unlike the millions of families who lost a loved one to racist conspiracy theories like qanon. People who thought they had the world figured out while losing what really matters while selling themselves and their communities out for a glimpse of a false feeling of community.

    In other words I've known a lot of different kinds of people, and the ones who are most distracted, haunted, and sad, are the ones who buy into the lies presented to us by the oligarchy and their proxies.

    I just hate to see someone work so hard to remain attached to dastardly, corrosive lies. But of course I am clearly an over thinker so maybe I lie to myself a little as well, to justify my own individualistic indulgence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (15 children)

    does not warrant complete dismissal of race and racism as objective social conditions

    When did I advocate for that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (14 children)

    Actions speak louder than words

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (13 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (12 children)

    Ive given a lot to this discussion and you've offered very little. I'm pretty sure you're just messing with me. Please engage with something worthwhile or disengage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (11 children)

    Volume =/= value.

    It's clear you have no clue what my actual take or position is here and just want to post endless walls of preachy text.

    Please engage with me instead of whatever shadow-boxing you're doing or disengage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    You're not offering me anything. I dont over write in order to dominate, I am just very inefficient writer and tend to edit out 3 pages for every 5 that I write, on average. You put preachiness on me like you perceive I put things on you.

    I've offered personal details and my own philosophy though, where you've typically mostly given one line snarky responses or questions. So to me you seem unserious and uncommitted to mutual understanding. Maybe that's wrong but its all I have to work with.

    If this isnt worth either of our time then what is the point?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (9 children)

    It's very simple: I was calling out the person I replied to for having a kneejerk reaction to seeing an article where a black person was arrested.

    At best it's vapid virtue-signaling, at worst it diminishes the real examples of systemic racial injustice that happen all too often.

    You then chose to jump in, assume my views, and then chastise your own assumptions about me.

    Of course I'm going to defensively insist that you point out examples of what you're accusing me of. Why should I bother engaging with all your strawmen?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

    So that is interesting. What is wrong with signalling virtue? In your previous comment, you said that volume =/= value. To me it seems you don't like when people try to be social and expressive, at least around certain topics.

    You haven't elaborated on what racial injustice looks like to you, you're just gate keeping other people's definitions. Those other definitions of racial injustice are vapid, but your own secret measure is beyond reproach. You ensure it is beyond reproach by never describing it or allowing it to be challenged. This implies a fear that you might be criticized.

    Skepticism isn't analysis. To me, it seems like you're all too willing to diminish real examples of systematic racism. Again, by going after "virtue signallers" you imply that your own position is the real virtuous one. And since you won't elaborate anything about it, then it is vapid, at least to me. As you can see I have no problem explaining my reasoning, and you won't even really challenge it. So what's the point?

    You can't or won't prove your own ideas so they don't exist outside your idealistic little thought cave. The most generous interpretation I can make based on our conversation is that you just dont really care about other people. That's sort of normal, unfortunately, but it doesnt make you correct or even relevant.

    I was playing games online a while back and a group of young people were in chat, and called one of the kids a "try hard". The kid's response: "I've never tried hard at anything in my life." That is how your virtue signalling comment appears to me. I want people to signal virtue, and you clearly believe in virtue/value. Signalling it helps virtuous people to find one another, and together we might accomplish something. For some reason, youve internalized it as a bad thing and I really don't understand why.

    Please elaborate on who the victims are of that comment you originally responded to. Or is that another idealistic little hypothetical covering for your own lack of critical thought, as it appears?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    What is wrong with signalling virtue?

    The emphasis is on vapid. Do you really not understand why people respond negatively to someone interjecting with some hardly-relevant comment just to make themselves look good?

    you said that volume =/= value. To me it seems you don’t like when people try to be social and expressive, at least around certain topics.

    That was specifically about you saying that you had "given a lot". Just because it's "a lot" doesn't mean it's valuable.

    You haven’t elaborated on what racial injustice looks like to you, you’re just gate keeping other people’s definitions.

    Actually I haven't done either. Because it's not particularly relevant to my point.

    Those other definitions of racial injustice are vapid

    I didn't say the definition was vapid. I said the act was vapid. Again, a wall of text about something I didn't say or do.

    Please elaborate on who the victims are of that comment you originally responded to.

    Again: at best, the people who have to rifle through those inane comments, and at worst, the people who's actual problems are diminished because the signal-to-noise ratio is out of whack.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    So your victims are hypothetical, but by your own admission, there are actual victims of systemic racism.

    The idea that you're saving people from inanity is very funny. How inane are we being right now?

    What a joke

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    So your victims are hypothetical

    Nice disingenuous framing.

    Like I said, it's very simple. The only reason we're still talking about this is because you're obsessed with writing walls of text to shadowbox with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Like I thought. Just a debate pervert.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Lol, and now you're gonna do that debate pervert thing where you must have the last word so you'll just keep repeating that phrase.

    Do it. Get that last word. Walk away with something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment