User: protogenguy2 (Huron) {FLLiX’s cutie} ID: 3DJC-26d291487e8ed2781ee2

Details: User has been active in https://perchance.org/furry-ai 18+ channel for over one month. They explicitly admitted to being 16 years old. Despite being instructed multiple times to leave, last time the user rejoined the chat on 2025/10/13 at 03:22 AM (UTC+8), just now.

The report button there doesn't do much.

Action Requested: Permanent ban for underage participation in an 18+ environment.

Evidence: Chat logs or screenshots confirming the self-admission of age (16) can be provided upon request.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 1 year ago (15 children)
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    Is nutty behavior seeing a 16 year old on a chat forum and reacting that he should be banned.

    Like... what you do is completely crazy behavior.

    I'm stopping you in your tracks here bud. Time-out. Is what I wanna say.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    If only you had finished your education properly, you did not need to rely on AIs for feeding you basic sentences.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Tell you what ; If ganking up on strangers online like this is what happens in perchance chats I'm happy the 16 year olds stay clear of it.

    Have your internet points. Just keep whatever strange community you have in this chat away from me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago* (9 children)

    im an innocent little law abiding citizen so pretend i didnt say anything but... secretly I'm on your side in this type of debate. I personally am a protector of people instead of call the cops on them. If a person wants to be in a place and isnt hurting anyone, idc what their age, gender, nationality is. I will help them unless they are a bad person. But also if the neighbor was an immigrant, I would probably protect them instead of call ICE on them. Treat others how you want to be treated. Everyone's different I guess.

    Also tho, pretend i didnt say anything because publically saying i would break rules would be stupid. you must have hallucinated that i seemed to say it.

    some people are safe places for others. some arent

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "some people are safe places for others. some aren't" that's the point, isn't it? It's not about ratting someone out, it's to protect minors. So you comparing it to "calling the cops/ICE" doesn't fit. Fact is, there are ppl in this world that aren't nice at all. And I'm very sorry, but a minor that openly admits being under 18 in an 18+ channel is obviously not smart enough/too naive to deal with such things and needs that kind of protection.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    good point. yes ive seen a kid try to trap a pedo and be messed up by simply being too naive. tho simultaneously, i thank my experiences as a kid in all sorts of obscure chatrooms for teaching me internet savvyness and fluency. i learned before 10years old to never give my address or personal information. i've seen both types.

    i also agree stating they are under 18 is a show they are in the naive group and, in that case, resulting restriction is actually a good lesson for them, whether to improve their internet savvyness or protect them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    No way this guy says "If a person wants to be in a place and isnt hurting anyone, idc what their age, gender, nationality is. I will help them unless they are a bad person". There you have it folks, coming from a headoverheels mod himself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    i help people. you hurt people. what can i say? people are just born different i guess 🤷🏼‍♀️

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I don’t know why you’d want to help a minor stay in an 18+ channel; removing them won’t hurt them at all. Is your idea of being a ‘protector of people’ really about defending minors’ right to be in 18+ spaces?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    that's not really what it's about :) i was more stating my personality type and that it is also automatically triggered to be on the side of the people in cases of 'government regulation vs people'.

    Basically, RandomPerchanceUser looked at you all in disgust and felt alone and I said "no, i empathize and inherently am like that too."

    im not really an expert on this specific situation, so my response isnt more complex than that nor pushing any agenda. im more a learner and would like knowledge than feel im pushing a specific outcome here. if u look at my response again you can see its all about showing my personality type and that it is aligned with RandomPerchanceUser and thus they arent alone.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    tho in some situations yes. Even here on Lemmy I have allowed ppl below the age requirements to interact without turning them in because I viewed it as a healthy learning experience for them. Every individual is different and every situation is different. So I would not answer your question with a blanket yes or no. But, as stated, I'm generally trustable and a safe place. It's my personality type. I don't really turn people in for things unless someone is being preyed on.

  • source
  • parent