cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/37367499

This is building consent for a US war on Venezuela.

Nobel war prize more like, considering the people they award this to.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I literally told you what you need to be anle to prove your claim. You need material evidence of this happening in the past.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)

    Material evidence of them giving a Noble Peace Prize to someone who ended up being a war criminal? Sounds pretty subjective to me.

    But I will bite. Obama. Now it is up to you to refute he is not a war criminal and it was not a shitty pick. GO!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    No, material proof of the USA forcing the Nobel committee to appoint someone as that is your actual claim. You don't have that so you are offering up a strawman

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    I never made that claim, you did. I can't prove a claim you made up. Please go back and try reading.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    " Doomsider @lemmy.world English Are you seriously suggesting that Noble Peace awards are beyond influence and corruption"

    Literally your claim. Do you have proof of this?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    And I gave an example of a corrupt pick. Obama.

    So I never said the US forced them to pick anyone only that they are not above influence.

    Are you done making up strawmen now?

    The amount of dishonesty you display is staggering.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    No you offered up a strawman with Obama as he was not picked by the USA nor have you provided evidence that Obama’s selection was influenced by the USA. You argued against his selection to “win” which is what a strawman argument is.

    You offered no proof of influence or corruption only a straw-man claim.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment