Title of the (concerning) thread on their community forum, not voluntary clickbait. Came across the thread thanks to a toot by @Khrys@mamot.fr (French speaking)

The gist of the issue raised by OP is that framework sponsors and promotes projects lead by known toxic and racists people (DHH among them).

I agree with the point made by the OP :

The “big tent” argument works fine if everyone plays by some basic civil rules of understanding. Stuff like code of conducts, moderation, anti-racism, surely those things we agree on? A big tent won’t work if you let in people that want to exterminate the others.

I'm disappointed in framework's answer so far

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 28 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Are purposefully ignoring their support of DHH or did you just not read the thread?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I must admit, i just read the sidebar, didn't proceed further to the thread.

    Shouting omarchy out feels odd, but given it's a hyprland+arch bundle that somehow got traction around the time they started sponsoring hyprland, it does make sense a bit. The critisizm on that part is justifiable

    Tho I'm not sure which users does omarchy even target, like who even wants a standardised setup while on arch+hyprland? Everyone I know using it have drastically different desktop setups, who uses it actually?

  • source
  • parent