you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

You mean the genocide that Harris said that she was going to support?

It's always amazing to me that Democrats get mad at people who couldn't stomach voting for genocide, instead of getting mad at the people who ran a pro-genocide campaign.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Also apparently leftists have to temper our criticism of a genocide by mentioning that Trump is always somehow worse despite there being no evidence that it is materially any worse under him - that's literally a counterfactual - but somehow this person gets to criticise us for mentioning a genocide without acknowledging that it is actually a genocide.

    It's genocide denial, but they're not denying it's happening, they're just denying that it's worth talking about, which is maybe worse?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I always read it as "It's not a big deal, as long as it's my team doing it". See also: Sending immigrants to torture prisons, rape, caring about corporations more than people, suppressing the working class, war, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Well, enjoy the textbook ethnic cleansing that was announced. On top of the continued genocide. Good job!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I will not, as I voted against it, which is more than the Democrats can say

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Was there a candidate that was against it? There were two options: genocide and turbo genocide. A vote "against it" (third party) is a vote that helped the winner.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments