Just had an oh-shit! moment at the library.

Depending on how things go, if the USB Implementers Forum can:

  • get the naming debacle figured out to where it's useful to people without sounding like gibberish.
  • develop USB-C to be more powerful than HDMI & DisplayPort.
  • lower licensing fees.

then USB-C could potentially overtake HDMI and DisplayPort in the graphics display cable market.


The reason I'm saying this is cause:

  • USB-C just_works.™️ for external/multi-monitor displays (it even works on my current dogshit NixOS laptop).
  • some manufacturers have already previously experimented/and sold graphics cards (GPUs) with USB-C as a display option.

As manufacturers already have to pay for HDMI/DisplayPort licensing fees, now it's just a matter of who can provide the most with the least overhead costs.

While it's not guranteed that USB-C is the true end solution, it does provide manufacturers with another option, which technically should lower costs for them to manufacture GPUs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Yeah, power (power monitor via PC or power minpc via monitor) plus fast wake-up (HDMI CEC/DP alt mode?), passthrough capability etc looks cool if you can get both sides of the hardware (plus the cable) to support it.

Fantastech II sale is today, prices will determine if I see any of this or keep using a 1050Ti and cheap old HDTV. EDIT: Not looking great for my chances so far...

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Nowhere in my comment did I say it didn't exist. Also, from your link:

    Cons: Expensive and relatively unavailable

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    That article is 2021. Relarively Unavailable has changed

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I was looking at options, one brand listed Thunderbolt 3.0 but others just listed alt-mode.

    Prices weren't too bad for monitors (if the specs make sense for your setup), but I went with an older monitor (HDMI 1.4, even though the monitor itself isn't that old) because it was a lower price for larger size (+better contrast ratio, known brand) considering I didn't upgrade my GPU anyway.

    EDIT: Rushed a bit, I'm seeing now could've made a (very similar) better choice for the same price, but can't change order now...

  • source
  • parent