So that's why a 2 systems were getting crappy speeds. Yes, 2. It had been used only to split a single drop from another switch between two systems.

New drop, happy clients.

Some stuff here is museum material.

A disconnected TP-Link SF1024 network switch, propped up on a small cardboard box.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

The phone lines repurposed as ethernet in my parents’ house also only do 100 Mb/s. I concur, so painful. I want to put a storage server there but no matter where it’s limited by awful speeds. It also means getting faster internet would be useless because it would be limited by these wires.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I wonder if it would have been the same cost to do an outdoor fiber run.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    Probably not, the costs were essentially just sticking ethernet ports on the walls next to the phone ports and rewiring the existing wires to those ports. And back when this was done (whenever we got DSL, around 2005 maybe?) fiber tech was probably prohibitively expensive. I haven’t looked up how much fiber modems cost but it would probably be more expensive even today.

  • source
  • parent