▲ 119 ▼ Found this while clearing out my old room (feddit.nl) submitted 1 year ago by Markus29@feddit.nl to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world 10 comments fedilink hide all child comments Back when windows was still decent
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (5 children) Home edition, decent? Going to respectively disagree with you. But yes, xp was peek OS. permalink fedilink source hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (3 children) Windows 2000 Pro for life. XP was just 2000 with round corners and added bloat on top. That sure sounds familiar, doesn't it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Most are like that ME to 98SE, vista to 7, 10 to 11 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, it's definitely been a recurring theme with Microsoft. I'm still of the opinion that 2000 was peak Windows. It didn't get in your way, had minimal added bullshit, but was significantly more stable than the 9x series due to being based on NT, and had wide hardware support at the time thanks to largely being able to use the same drivers as the subsequent XP. It's been all downhill one way or another ever since. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago 100%. 2000pro was first and last time I felt like OS just worked and didn't have to pay attention to it. This is what OS should be. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Markus29@feddit.nl [S] 3 points 1 year ago True, but at the time we only had one PC so we didn't really care about remote desktop, file shares and user groups etc. I was mostly busy playing GTA back then. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (3 children) Windows 2000 Pro for life. XP was just 2000 with round corners and added bloat on top. That sure sounds familiar, doesn't it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Most are like that ME to 98SE, vista to 7, 10 to 11 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, it's definitely been a recurring theme with Microsoft. I'm still of the opinion that 2000 was peak Windows. It didn't get in your way, had minimal added bullshit, but was significantly more stable than the 9x series due to being based on NT, and had wide hardware support at the time thanks to largely being able to use the same drivers as the subsequent XP. It's been all downhill one way or another ever since. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago 100%. 2000pro was first and last time I felt like OS just worked and didn't have to pay attention to it. This is what OS should be. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Most are like that ME to 98SE, vista to 7, 10 to 11 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, it's definitely been a recurring theme with Microsoft. I'm still of the opinion that 2000 was peak Windows. It didn't get in your way, had minimal added bullshit, but was significantly more stable than the 9x series due to being based on NT, and had wide hardware support at the time thanks to largely being able to use the same drivers as the subsequent XP. It's been all downhill one way or another ever since. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago 100%. 2000pro was first and last time I felt like OS just worked and didn't have to pay attention to it. This is what OS should be. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, it's definitely been a recurring theme with Microsoft. I'm still of the opinion that 2000 was peak Windows. It didn't get in your way, had minimal added bullshit, but was significantly more stable than the 9x series due to being based on NT, and had wide hardware support at the time thanks to largely being able to use the same drivers as the subsequent XP. It's been all downhill one way or another ever since. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago 100%. 2000pro was first and last time I felt like OS just worked and didn't have to pay attention to it. This is what OS should be. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago 100%. 2000pro was first and last time I felt like OS just worked and didn't have to pay attention to it. This is what OS should be. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Markus29@feddit.nl [S] 3 points 1 year ago True, but at the time we only had one PC so we didn't really care about remote desktop, file shares and user groups etc. I was mostly busy playing GTA back then. permalink fedilink source parent