314
Yea well it still can't have an existential crisis like humans can! Take that! (media.piefed.social)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/memes@sopuli.xyz
84 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 1 year ago* (8 children)

Until it leaves a security issue that isn't immediately visible and your users get pwned.

Funny that you say "bullshit you make up", when all LLMs do is hallucinate and sometimes, by coincidence, have a "correct" result.

I use them when I'm stumped or hit "writer's block", but I certainly wouldn't have them produce 500 lines and then assume that just because it works, it must be good to go.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    No one ever said push it to production without a code review.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    "my coworkers should have to read the 500 lines of slop so I don't have to"

    That also implies that code reviews are always thoroughly scrutinized. They aren't, and if a whole team is vibecoding everything, they especially aren't. Since you've got this mentality, you've definitely got some security issues you don't know about. Maybe go find and fix them?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    If your QA process can let known security flaws into production, then you need to redesign your QA process.

    Also, no one ever said that the person generating 500 lines of code isn't reviewing it themselves.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Calculations with bugs do not magically produce correct results and plot them correctly. Neither can such simple code change values that were read from a file or device. Etc.

    I do not care what you program and how bugs can sneak in there. I use it for data analysis, simulations etc. with exactly zero security implications or generally interactions with anything outside the computer.

    The hostility here against anyone using LLMs/AI is absurd.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Then why do you bring up code reviews and 500 lines of code? We were not talking about your "simulations" or whatever else you bring up here. We're talking about you saying it can create 500 lines of code, and that it's okay to ship it if it "just works" and have someone review your slop.

    I have no idea what you're trying to say with your first paragraph. Are you trying to say it's impossible for it to coincidentally get a correct result? Because that's literally all it can do. LLMs do not think, they do not reason, they do not understand. They are not capable of that. They are literally hallucinating all of the time, because that's how they work. That's why OpenAI had to admit that they are unable to stop hallucinations, because it's impossible given that's how LLMs work.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
    • load more comments (1 reply)