YESSSSSSSSSSSSS

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (8 children)
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Not sure I should be engaging here but are you seriously stalking downvotes?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    I was just curious. Seemed really weird to downvote.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Alright, I’ll bite.

    I’m a bit surprised that anyone would bother to note a downvote, let alone dig deep enough to investigate who downvoted and then specifically call them (me) out in the comments. It feels over the top and borderline malicious.

    As to why I downvoted in this case, two reasons:

    • discussion of someone’s pet name for a family member seems very irrelevant in this case, not particularly “contributing to the conversation”. I get why the question was asked and answered but it seems so far from anything important, especially now that it’s been explained.
    • it bothers me that someone would write as if the reader should be expected to somehow know who their husband is, let alone by reference to their pet name.

    Lastly, I don’t know why someone would ever be so invested in up- or down-votes at all. It’s not like the fediverse has the Reddit concept of “Karma” or whatever one wants to call fake internet points. It’s disappointing to have a negative total on a post sure but it’s completely ephemeral and irrelevant to one’s life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    1). "His lordship" is actually a pretty common way to refer to your spouse in third person, it's a cultural joke to the extent you can even get mugs of it on amazon. It's not actually a pet name, he doesn't get called that irl, just online so a better phrase would have been sobriquet or moniker i suppose, but my brain was still coming online in the morning

    1. just because you don't understand something is not a valid reason to shit on it

    2. just because a conversation occurs that you don't like is also not a valid reason to shit on it.

    The world is much, much larger than you are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)