you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -18 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's a political problem. Houseless people are there because there's no political willpower to create systematic change to support them. So you're absolutely right when you say:

    we must either come up with new resources or reevaluate our investments in the resources we currently employ.

    The only problem is the answer to this question is more often on the side of the investment not being worth it, so the problem is left unaddressed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I've worked with hundreds of homeless people, usually trying to help them before the cops sweep their camp, or keeping their car rolling so they can keep living in it.

    There was a ubiquitous set of conditions:

    • can't afford housing even though they had a job.
    • lost identifying documents, usually in a sweep, and working on replacing them. You can't get work without these.
    • no reliable postal address
    • no support network

    I've never met anyone who wanted to be living on the street.

    I'm not talking about crust punks train hopping. I'm talking about the people who missed a day of work for whatever reason and couldn't make rent one month. Now they're in a tent near available services because the shelter kicked them out after the max stay of a week.

    Being a therapist gives you no expertise here and it seems to me that a therapist who sees punishment as a viable means for behavioral change is kind of shit at their job.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Hey maybe I'm stupid too, but it seems to me it'd be way fucking easier and cheaper to just put some flyers in a little letterbox attached to the bench advertising the nearest homeless shelter or something, rather than inconveniencing literally everyone who wants to use the bench. But what do I know, I'm probably just stupid

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Literally anyone using the bench potentially prevents someone else from also using the bench. Why is it a bigger deal when it's a homeless person doing the using? Also, I'm sure there are other more attention grabbing options than a flyer, if we use our imaginations a little bit. Why is your focus on prevention and not education/outreach anyways?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -2 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    What difference does to make if someone is sitting on the bench, laying down, standing, crouching, or in any other comfortable resting position? It's a public bench, to be used by the public however they see fit, as long as they're not causing harm.

    It's weird to enforce the "correct" usage of a public bench, or the "correct" amount of space a person is allowed to take up, especially with such drastic elements that you yourself admit are not very effective.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Imagine trying to spin anti-homeless architecture as pro-homeless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    "Welcome! What brings you to the homeless shelter today?"

    "Well, it's that bench. You see, I was choosing the unhoused lifestyle, and I was fine with all the other stigma and physical discomforts, until I realized that the city wants to discourage my presence in public spaces. Fuck these armrests, I decided I'd just come to this shelter, get treatment for my addiction, get counseling for my traumatic past that fed the addiction, get an education, get a job, rent a house, save money, then buy a home instead. It's just not worth trying to get comfy on that bench."

  • source
  • parent