you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 1 year ago (7 children)

You believe that this regime would release an accurate accounting of the so-called messages?

I don't trust a single fucking thing the Nazis are saying.

Ponder this as well, why are they releasing pre-trial evidence so freely? I thought things under investigation (like the FUCKING EPSTEIN EVIDENCE) were supposed to be sealed up tight during investigations?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    This is conspiracy thinking.

    The Utah county prosecutors office released those texts, not the Trump administration. You're suggesting that the president and his goons have infiltrated the local prosecutor to plant fake evidence where the shooter obliquely indicates he's left leaning when the fuckwits can't even keep reporters out of their signal chats?

    Releasing non-confidential information to the public is common in high visibility cases like this at this point in the investigation. They haven't released anything that would compromise witnesses etc. which is what should be kept under seal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Jeff Gray (Republican Party) ran for election to the Utah County Attorney. He was on the ballot in the Republican primary on June 28, 2022.

    He is one of the fascist controlled goons.

    Every single republican is compromised. Active enemies of the republic. If they weren't, they would denounce America's Hitler publicly.

    So yea, I don't trust a single fucking word any single worthless anti-american republican could ever spew.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Who knows, but are you assuming that the prosecutors are nonpartisan...? And I'm not an expert on US law, but I thought pre-trial stuff is kept as quiet as possible to not impact the jury selection process and such?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I'm not assuming that all the prosecutors are nonpartisan, but I am assuming that many people would have interacted with this evidence and either tricking all those people or keeping them quiet would be difficult. This is an instance where Occam's Razor holds true and there most likely isn't some insidious plot to release altered texts to push an agenda.

    I'm not an expert on US law either, but my intuition is that knowledge of these texts wouldn't exclude anyone from Jury selection unless this evidence ended up not being usable in court?

  • source
  • parent