OAuth
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 24 points 1 year ago (16 children)
  • [+] 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (16 children)
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Half a cryptographic key that you can't easily give to someone over the phone by accident.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    By convention. See for example: https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/issues/10407

    We’ve had certificate authentication (backed by hardware) for ages. We could fix the UX there and be done with it, but nooooo, we are reinventing everything again. (Tangentially related: JWT, OIDC and SAML are basically kerberos with extra steps.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I've been using certificate based auth on https for ages on my ops stuff. Most devices support just slapping an SSL/TLS key into their os, but not everything.

    But when I wanted to use it for Jellyfin, I found TVs and sticks aren't all straightforward.

    In your link, they closed that ticket as not planned because they intend to implement FIDO's secure exchange protocols. https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/issues/11363

    It should (hopefully) be secure when they get done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I mean, the passkey is still in there. It’s protected by convention. It’s a bearer token wrapped in a password manager, presented as a revolution.

    We have the technology, can we please pour the same amount of resources into what we’ve already had for decades? Passkeys solve the UX issue for ”normal people”, that’s the selling point.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    a very long password that (ideally) is only bound to a single device, requires a second identifier (biometric, PIN, password) and that is phishing resistant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago

    Bitwarden has been working great with me as sits transition to passkeys, even big corporate ones.

    But yeah in practice, google and facebook are going to probably dominate because they are the easy + free option.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    KeepassXC supports passkeys as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    thus rendering them redundant, because their strength is being bound to a single physical device. if they're portable, they're as good as asymmetric key pairs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Their strength is being half a cryptographic key, not that they’re device bound.

    That was a “requirement” that big tech wanted, to force you to be dependent on TPM storage, so you’d be forced to use a Trusted(tm) device and OS. It was made optional after pushback from basically everyone else.

    Password managers support Passkeys now. Bitwarden and KeePassX among others.

    As long as I trust that my password manager is secure, and as long as I use a strong master password or (better) have a hardware key to unlock it, it is way more secure than a password, and I can still install Linux without losing my logins.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    that's not the point, passkeys are not vendor centric, they are a standard. you don't want to duplicate a passkey for the same reason you don't want to copy an SSH private key on multiple devices. it's a security feature that allows disabling the account access in case the device becomes compromised (lost, stolen, infected, etc.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    i refuse to give my phone my thumbprint or do a face unlock. i'm not sure if it's still collecting a biometric bullshit on my face, but i have not done it myself. I'm a luddite here and i insist on it so no one (especially no one trying to violate the united states 4th amendment) can get into my phone without my permission or hacking into it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    i refuse to give my phone my thumbprint or do a face unlock. i'm not sure if it's still collecting a biometric bullshit on my face, but i have not done it myself.

    Then get a Yubikey. Replace “something you are” with “something you have”. It’s not ideal to have two somethings you have as your two factors, but a password to get into the computer to get to the passkey adds an extra layer that makes me comfortable with it.

    I'm a luddite here and i insist on it so no one (especially no one trying to violate the united states 4th amendment) can get into my phone without my permission or hacking into it.

    In the context of this discussion, it’s one of two factors. But I agree with you when it’s the only factor.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    Ooh-la-la, someone's gonna get laid in college.

    Edit: This is a joking reference from a Rick and Morty episode (S02E06).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    You forgot, you descended into the lemmy-verse powering your car where the concept of Rick and Morty humor is not appreciated and often not tolerated.

    ;)

    WUBBU-LUBBA-DUB-DUB!!!!!!!!

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)