archive.is link to article from allabout.ai at https://www.allaboutai.com/resources/ai-statistics/ai-environment/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 50 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Your article doesn’t even claim that. Do you have any idea just how carbon intensive a flight is?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    I imagine people making that claim accept air travel as useful and "AI", really, all datacenters as not useful. I've had people tell me oh, air travel is more efficient per mile that road travel. But this ignores that people wouldn't drive thousands of miles if it was not as easy as booking a flight.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (-1 children)

    For modern planes 70 - 90k liter.. it's bad enough, no need to exaggerate

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow -1 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (-1 children)

    ...and I take it they burn three hundred thousand litres to run the Atlantic as well?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow -1 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I mean an Atlantic round trip fully laden, yah but that's just even economical compared to private jet travel, which completely defeats the purpose of the shock value number

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-2 replies)
  • load more comments (-2 replies)
  • load more comments (-2 replies)
  • load more comments (-2 replies)
  • load more comments (-2 replies)