961
Might as well say it out loud. (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/aiop@lemmy.world
193 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
Tolerance for the intolerant is suicide for society. People who deny human rights for others deserve no human rights for themselves. They must be ridiculed, ostracized, outlawed, and if they still won't shut up, they must be beaten senseless.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

And if the Trump administration were exterminating people in death camps and had been convicted in international criminal court then you would have a point.

As it is the administration is obviously ignoring its own laws and being disgusting with racial profiling when deporting immigrants in the country illegally, and grabbing legal immigrants and citizens through this overzealousness and rule/law breaking.

The US is not committing a holocaust against Hispanics. It is not committing one against the LGBTQ community either. Even if you believe that the US is capable of committing one here and that it is coming, it is not happening yet and so Charlie Kirk cannot be an execution for propaganda supporting mass murder/genocide that has already taken place.

Execution for crimes that will be committed in the future is execution for thought crime or execution for free speech.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Ah OK, so we have to let them systematically murder countless people before we can do anything. Got it.

    It's not like we should ever learn from history, and try to do things differently this time.

    And by the way, I'm not talking about extrajudicial killing. We were talking about Nazi trials.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    That is not what I am saying at all, we have many other options before getting to killing as the solution. Learning from history is the point, but you do not jump the gun on death being the penalty for things. The ammo box is the last box to be used for a reason.

    If you are not talking obliquely about extrajudicial killings, why are you saying opposing it means we can do nothing until the genocide happens? You were talking about the execution of a propagandist that supported the Holocaust as a direct comparison with Kirk. This comparison can really only be used as an explanation for why it was somehow acceptable for him to be killed. The up thread was about justifying Kirk's death as a Nazi propagandist.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent